Representation of owner of 282 acres of land located at the waterfront above the Union Valley Reservoir in a case tried in federal court. Our success at trial is attributed in large part to key rulings that (a) the condemnee was entitled to value of the upland enhanced by the somewhat earlier taking of the reservoir which was, therefore, a "separate project" and (b) that condemnee had the option to value the taking either as a separate parcel or as part of the larger remainder.